From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21689 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2010 09:17:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21678 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2010 09:17:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:17:15 +0000 From: "hainque at adacore dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hainque at adacore dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03512.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #8 from hainque at adacore dot com 2010-11-29 09:17:03 UTC --- dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Has anyone reported this AIX assembler behavior to IBM? It would be > much more effective coming from an external customer than from me. We haven't done that on our side. We haven't observed the 64K limit. We had observed the 0 case and thought it was legitimate to consider this invalid, so came up with a change close to what was suggested upthread, with comments on their possible origin after investgation. (attached) I can provide a testcase that triggered on 4.5 at least. Olivier