From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-338488-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24132 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2010 10:27:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 24119 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2010 10:27:34 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:27:31 +0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/46666] gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed
Message-ID: <bug-46666-4-2852pQciGL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46666-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46666-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:32:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg03221.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46666

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2010.11.26 10:27:18
                 CC|                            |nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26 10:27:18 UTC ---
Hm.  We do VEC_safe_grow with a size of 0 which doesn't end up allocating
a vector but then unconditionally stores to it.  It explicitly allows for
size == 0, so better play safe.

OTOH there are multiple similar problems in vec.h.  CCing author.