From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-339117-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 2596 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2010 21:51:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 2586 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2010 21:51:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:51:35 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/46749] gcc.dg/debug/pr41893-1.c -gdwarf-2 testsuite failures on darwin
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46749-4-1QjWGw1S6A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:51:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00100.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749

--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2010-12-01 21:51:18 UTC ---
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
> 
> --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-01 21:34:19 UTC ---
> splitting the command into compile and link steps will intentionally remove the
> dsymutil step -  thus making the problem 'go away' ...
> 
> dsymutil should _only_ be called if there is a source file on the c/l 
> (which would have its object deleted and thus be unavailable for debug).

Huh, ok.  But the spec seems to call it unconditionally in the 
link-command-spec when -g is visible.  At least I can't see how
a "source file" is matched (and we now definitely do find object
files as source for the link step).

And the issue is probably that we match on the intermediate link
command but execute only after that is finished.

Well, that dsymutil hack looks like a hack.