From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-340541-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8171 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2010 01:14:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 8158 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Dec 2010 01:14:50 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:14:46 +0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/46770] Replace .ctors/.dtors with .init_array/.fini_array on targets supporting them
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46770-4-04FyPSMeCm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46770-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46770-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:14:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01524.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46770

--- Comment #55 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2010-12-14 01:14:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> H.J, Cary is talking about multiple global constructors in a single file, none
> of which use constructor priorities.  In other words, the normal case.  gcc
> generates those in a specific required order for the .ctors section.  If it
> does not reverse the order for .init_array, I don't see how it could possible
> work correctly.
> 
> Again: a single file, no priorities specified.

It is handled by the C++ front end. Only one entry in .ctors/.init_array
section in a single file. Order within a single file doesn't matter.