public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
@ 2010-12-06 16:02 kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:27 ` [Bug c++/46824] " kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: kuh3h3 at gmail dot com @ 2010-12-06 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Summary: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for
‘operator*’ in
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: kuh3h3@gmail.com
i tried to compile chromium recent version with trunk recent version gcc 4.6.
but failed. y think this is compiler problems.
$ /media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/bin/g++-46 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/bin/g++-46
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1
--with-gmp=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1 --with-mpfr=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1
--with-mpc=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1 --program-suffix=-46
--with-ppl=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1 --with-cloog=/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1
--disable-multilib -with-stage1-ldflags=-Wl,-rpath,/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/lib
-with-boot-ldflags=-Wl,-rpath,/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-checking=release
--disable-cloog-version-check
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20101204 (experimental) (GCC)
[/media/sdc1/chromium-trunk/src]$ make chrome chrome_sandbox BUILDTYPE=Release
V=1
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/media/sdc1/chromium-trunk/src/out/Release/lib.host:/media/sdc1/chromium-trunk/src/out/Release/lib.target:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH;
cd build/util; mkdir -p
/media/sdc1/chromium-trunk/src/out/Release/obj/gen/build; python
./lastchange.py -o
"/media/sdc1/chromium-trunk/src/out/Release/obj/gen/build/LASTCHANGE" -d
../LASTCHANGE.in
ccache /media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/bin/g++-46 -B/media/sdc2/gcc-4.5.1/bin/
'-DNO_HEAPCHECKER' '-DCHROMIUM_BUILD' '-DENABLE_REMOTING=1' '-DENABLE_GPU=1'
'-DU_STATIC_IMPLEMENTATION' '-DUSE_SYSTEM_ZLIB' '-DUSE_GCONF'
'-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS' '-DNDEBUG' '-DNVALGRIND'
'-DDYNAMIC_ANNOTATIONS_ENABLED=0' -Ithird_party/icu/public/common
-Ithird_party/icu/public/i18n -I. -Isdch/open-vcdiff/src
-Iout/Release/obj/gen/net -Iv8/include -pthread -fno-exceptions -Wall
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-missing-field-initializers -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-fvisibility=hidden -pipe -m32 -mmmx -march=pentium4 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse
-fno-strict-aliasing -pthread -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo
-I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include
-I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng14
-I/usr/include/qt4 -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore
-DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0
-I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0
-I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pixman-1
-I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng14 -I/usr/include/qt4
-I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -Inet/third_party/nss/ssl
-IWebKit/chromium/net/third_party/nss/ssl -I/usr/include/nss
-I/usr/include/nspr -O2 -fno-ident -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections
-fno-rtti -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -MMD -MF
out/Release/.deps/out/Release/obj.target/net/net/http/http_net_log_params.o.d.raw
-c -o out/Release/obj.target/net/net/http/http_net_log_params.o
net/http/http_net_log_params.cc
In file included from net/http/http_net_log_params.cc:7:0:
./net/http/http_net_log_params.h: In member function ‘const
net::HttpResponseHeaders& net::NetLogHttpResponseParameter::GetHeaders()
const’:
./net/http/http_net_log_params.h:54:13: error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
‘*((const
net::NetLogHttpResponseParameter*)this)->net::NetLogHttpResponseParameter::headers_’
make: *** [out/Release/obj.target/net/net/http/http_net_log_params.o] error 1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
@ 2010-12-06 16:27 ` kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: kuh3h3 at gmail dot com @ 2010-12-06 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
kuh3h3 at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |blocker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:27 ` [Bug c++/46824] " kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
@ 2010-12-06 16:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2010-12-07 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2010-12-06 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:27 ` [Bug c++/46824] " kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2010-12-07 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-07 12:13 ` kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-07 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2010.12.07 11:18:12
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-07 11:18:12 UTC ---
Please attach preprocessed source of the file with the error.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-07 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-07 12:13 ` kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2011-03-10 17:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: kuh3h3 at gmail dot com @ 2010-12-07 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #2 from kuh3h3 at gmail dot com 2010-12-07 12:12:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 22670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22670
preprocessed http_net_log_params.cc file
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-07 12:13 ` kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
@ 2011-03-10 17:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 18:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC| |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 17:20:05 UTC ---
This started being rejected with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167250
I'll let Dodji/Jason comment on whether the testcase is valid or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 17:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 18:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 18:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 18:04:03 UTC ---
Reduced:
template <class T>
struct scoped_refptr {
operator T*() const;
};
class EventParameters { };
class HttpResponseHeaders;
struct NetLogHttpResponseParameter : public EventParameters {
const HttpResponseHeaders& GetHeaders() const {
return *headers_;
}
scoped_refptr<HttpResponseHeaders> headers_;
};
EDG rejects this with the same error. Clang accepts it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 18:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 18:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 21:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 18:08:52 UTC ---
really reduced:
class Incomplete;
struct Ptr
{
operator Incomplete*();
};
int main()
{
Ptr p;
*p;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 18:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 21:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 21:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 21:20:52 UTC ---
Thank you for reducing this.
Here is what I understand from the reduced test case.
For the expression "*p" the compiler uses overload resolution to
determine which operator "*" to use. As there is no user provided
operator*() that can take an instance of Ptr in argument, the only
choice left is to consider the built-in operator*() as a viable
candidate for overload resolution.
But then the note in [over.built]/1 says:
because built-in operators take only operands with non-class type, and
operator overload resolution occurs only when an operand expression
originally has class or enumeration type, operator overload resolution
can resolve to a built-in operator only when an operand has a class type
that has a user-defined conversion to a non-class type appropriate for
the operator, or when an operand has an enumeration type that can be
converted to a type appropriate for the operator.
As there is no user-defined conversion operator that would convert Ptr
into a pointer to native type, the built-in operator*() is not a viable
candidate.
Thus I believe the test case is ill-formed and the user-defined
conversion operator that converts Ptr to Incomplete* seems to be of
little use in this case.
So for the built-in operator to be selected, we'd need e.g, a
user-defined conversion operator Ptr::operator int* (). Otherwise we'd
need a user-defined operator 'something Ptr::operator*()'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 21:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 21:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 21:30:34 UTC ---
It doesn't need to be a pointer to non-class type; a pointer to class is itself
a non-class type.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 21:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 22:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 22:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 22:26:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> It doesn't need to be a pointer to non-class type; a pointer to class is itself
> a non-class type.
Indeed. And the example compiles fine if the type is complete. I can't find
any wording that says why converting to Incomplete* should not be allowed when
converting to Complete* is ok. I wondered if DR416 is relevant, but I don't
think it applies, as T1 is Ptr here, which is complete.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 22:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 22:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:57 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-10 22:53:42 UTC ---
Yes, I was confused. This code is valid.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 22:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-10 22:57 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 10:06 ` [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-10 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|dodji at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-10 22:57 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 10:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 11:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Priority|P3 |P1
Known to work| |3.4.6, 4.1.2, 4.5.2
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|chromium-compile failed |[4.6 Regression]
|because error: no match for |chromium-compile failed
|‘operator*’ in |because error: no match for
| |‘operator*’ in
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 10:05:59 UTC ---
Works with 4.5.2 and earlier releases and EDG.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-11 10:06 ` [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 11:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 11:58:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Works with [...] EDG.
The reduced versions don't work with Comeau online, does a different EDG-based
compiler accept them?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-11 11:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-11 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 7:28 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-11 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-11 14:21:26 UTC ---
I checked comment #5 with ICC 12.0 in -strict_ansi mode.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-11 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 7:28 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 7:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
--- Comment #13 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 07:28:26 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Sat Mar 12 07:28:20 2011
New Revision: 170897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170897
Log:
PR c++/46824
gcc/cp/
* call.c (add_builtin_candidate)<case INDIRECT_REF>: The type
of the argument of the indirection operator should not be
dependent. Fix the comment.
gcc/testsuite/
* g++.dg/conversion/cast3.C: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/cast3.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/call.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2011-03-12 7:28 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-12 7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-12 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46824
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-12 07:58:47 UTC ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-12 7:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-06 16:02 [Bug c++/46824] New: chromium-compile failed because error: no match for ‘operator*’ in kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:27 ` [Bug c++/46824] " kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2010-12-06 16:30 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2010-12-07 11:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-07 12:13 ` kuh3h3 at gmail dot com
2011-03-10 17:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 18:04 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 18:09 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 21:21 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 21:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:27 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:53 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-10 22:57 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 10:06 ` [Bug c++/46824] [4.6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 11:58 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-11 14:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 7:28 ` dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-12 7:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).