From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-339671-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20942 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2010 04:09:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 20931 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2010 04:09:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:09:31 +0000
From: "schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/46831] [C++0x] Crash when it tries to do an invalid ICS with a conversion function template
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46831-4-383PMmBrx8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46831-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46831-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 04:09:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00654.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831

--- Comment #1 from Johannes Schaub <schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com> 2010-12-07 04:09:25 UTC ---
-------------------------------------------------
GCC also rejects this valid code:
----------

struct A { 
  template<typename T = void> operator short(); 
  template<typename T = void> operator long(); 
}; 

void f(long); 
void f(int);

// this call is not ambiguous, but GCC claims it is
int main() { f(A()); }

Also, if we make the second conversion functon a non-template, GCC suddenly
accepts the code (right at it, the code is still valid). 

But that indicates that GCC has internally the handling of
13.3.3[over.match.best]p1 bullet 4 and bullet 5 reversed: It first checks
whether one is a template and the other is a non-template, and only then checks
whether the return type of F1 converts better than the return type of F2. 

--------------------------------------------------
We can make this to crash on valid code, too:
--------

struct B { }; 
struct D : B { }; 
struct A { 
  template<typename T = void> operator D&(); 
  operator long(); 
}; 

void f(long); 
void f(B&);

int main() { f(A()); }