From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-341131-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15744 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2010 16:09:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 15731 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2010 16:09:33 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:09:29 +0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/46869] FAIL: 20_util/enable_shared_from_this/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not _ZNSt23enable_shared_from_thisIiEC2Ev
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46869-4-s8bUQlP6Ps@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:09:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg02114.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46869

--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2010-12-17 16:09:09 UTC ---
> --- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-16 22:49:23 UTC ---
>
> Does this still happen if -g is removed? (Via -g0)

I've manually checked for

FAIL: 20_util/enable_shared_from_this/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not
_ZNSt23enable_shared_from_thisIiEC2Ev
FAIL: 20_util/enable_shared_from_this/cons/constexpr.cc scan-assembler-not
_ZN7derivedC2Ev

Both symbols only occur in stabs, but are gone with -g0.  I've found no
easy way to compile the tests with -g0 from runtest, though.  Setting
DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS=-g0 either on the runtest command line or in site.exp
seems to have no effect.

    Rainer