From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-344346-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19013 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2011 00:32:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 19001 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2011 00:32:03 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:31:47 +0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dj at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46878-4-0B2N1tOSFy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:43:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02285.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878

--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:31:30 UTC ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/21/11 15:22, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
> 
> DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |dj at redhat dot com
> 
> --- Comment #7 from DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> 2011-01-21 22:21:48 UTC ---
> sched-deps:sched_analyze_2 has this:
> 
> #ifdef HAVE_cc0
>     case CC0:
>       /* User of CC0 depends on immediately preceding insn.  */
>       SCHED_GROUP_P (insn) = 1;
> 
> But the conditional before the setcc was deleted (that's insn 22).
> So the comment above is wrong in this case; there is no immediately preceeding
> insn.
When the conditional was deleted, was SCHED_GROUP_P set on the following
insn?

jeff

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNOiVEAAoJEBRtltQi2kC76uYH/0HO/T/PXYL4kSaGWolf3MIh
C2IyMaRqSRLtjVN1y2YGTF1JE8UezHwWv9rYY9NzgaIAFpBoCQ0QYK3fxJXz5pH8
2yEq64LsNcnlCSrNy8NKgdqc3l3a2KaiT4ZVwqsflPnrrxt3LZElx+zrdXOAz7Me
5GFsHOpG6PfOcd9WNwD+Os54Fx5UB8ooMk4DZFf30rHe6HUMJf0kvwHambAfLXXx
4AnEAz90iyUaFGK37rNxVRTlzk33rWaNA+8rJrA54IcqLN7Q8fCugAqp5xT2152r
+jDITL376B+vZB7J1HTnelgZ2fZvOOZkx0A7bh+QUablG3arkx06InMbRI+AhtE=
=k4Kp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----