From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-344347-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3802 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2011 00:34:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 3719 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2011 00:34:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:34:27 +0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dj at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46878-4-kH42mh16fi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02286.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878

--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:33:26 UTC ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
> 
> DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Attachment #23014|0                           |1
>         is obsolete|                            |
>              Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
>          AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |dj at redhat dot com
>                    |gnu.org                     |
> 
> --- Comment #8 from DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> 2011-01-21 22:31:37 UTC ---
> Created attachment 23074
>   --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23074
> alternate patch 2
> 
> This one checks to make sure there *is* an immediately preceeding insn. 
> Better?
I'm still quite concerned you're papering over the problem.  Can you
give a dump immediately before the setcc is removed?

Jeff

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNOiXEAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7QYwIAIzmPzqeKqI5wyRACB4F0dLu
CeCWykoaGKSP5b/zHNB6eEethxcOKh2VC8vcpLkmaqx7zMGRx3biUAlrz0D/SXZc
0RWlQyPx2j+sUYWZbcNZbfH3b2Osl8AgsC7d3llKJK5zdkR1UYbS2hURodjyb/Y0
OjtyWD0layQQZ9/sCB8yZHTb7CRvPMDxHl4+vEe0vEBeGIHGsmOJRuR/iICqPm4O
EVV2A4x0ZCc5TAwdGZacyeJZN4chIW/BTlKDfyliCEnwjg0zpFwwH/uA+42EHd8y
I0kD86BhN/9D89WjiLxgpVXGGw91AE1ZWVdopDtpePppq+gV4++KsDnaE0DapBg=
=rJ+i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----