public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
@ 2010-12-10 16:46 michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2010-12-13 16:47 ` [Bug target/46887] " rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 more replies)
  0 siblings, 11 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at @ 2010-12-10 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

           Summary: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be
                    '-bernotok'
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: michael.haubenwallner@salomon.at


The AIX linker does not understand '-bnoerok', but '-bernotok'.
While there have been more occurences in older releases, there is still one in
current trunk:

libjava/classpath/ltcf-cxx.sh:        no_undefined_flag=' ${wl}-bnoerok'

This has to be "-bernotok".


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
@ 2010-12-13 16:47 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-12-13 22:19 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-13 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rwild at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-13 16:46:54 UTC ---
Does this actually hit you any time?  If yes, please post configure command
line, and cut and paste error and command(s) that caused it, and whether the
obvious fix lets the build succeed where it did not before.  Thanks.

The ltcf* and ltconfig stuff is so old and outdated, I didn't think it was used
anywhere in the tree any more.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2010-12-13 16:47 ` [Bug target/46887] " rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-13 22:19 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2011-02-28 17:11 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at @ 2010-12-13 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #2 from Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at> 2010-12-13 22:18:57 UTC ---
It did hit me in gcc-4.2.4 (languages=c,c++) in Gentoo Prefix on AIX, where I
do have some automagic patches to enable runtime linking by default as well as
full "soname" support (still to be sorted out with libtool upstream).

So I'm unable to hit this problem with vanilla gcc-4.2.4, even not with
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl for unknown reason.
For gcc-trunk, I've just searched the sources for 'bnoerok' and still found it,
although I'm unsure if this would hit me whenever I start using gcc-java.

If this code is old and unused, I'm fine with its removal during normal
development.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2010-12-13 16:47 ` [Bug target/46887] " rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-12-13 22:19 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
@ 2011-02-28 17:11 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-03-02  5:49 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-28 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.02.28 16:50:45
                 CC|                            |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-28 17:11 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-03-02  5:49 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-12-09 16:03 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-03-02  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #3 from Ralf Wildenhues <rwild at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-02 05:49:25 UTC ---
dje, you marked this PR as NEW.  Why?  Michael didn't confirm it with pristine
GCC.  If you can reproduce it yourself, please reread and follow comment #1. 
Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-03-02  5:49 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-12-09 16:03 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
  2011-12-10 20:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gseanmcg at gmail dot com @ 2011-12-09 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #4 from Sean McGovern <gseanmcg at gmail dot com> 2011-12-09 16:01:52 UTC ---
Please reconfirm with a recent GCC, or close if it has been fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-09 16:03 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
@ 2011-12-10 20:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-12-10 21:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-12-10 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-10 20:31:45 UTC ---
The problem still exists, but classpath is maintained upstream, not by GCC.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-10 20:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-12-10 21:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-12-12 14:33 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-12-10 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-10 20:37:47 UTC ---
This bug really should have been opened for the "classpath" Product in
Bugzilla, not for "gcc".  I do not think the bug can be transferred.  The
command definitely is wrong for AIX, but I don't think the option ever will be
used when building classpath.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-10 21:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-12-12 14:33 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
  2011-12-12 14:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: gseanmcg at gmail dot com @ 2011-12-12 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #7 from Sean McGovern <gseanmcg at gmail dot com> 2011-12-12 14:30:27 UTC ---
If this can't be reassigned, can we just close it as "not ours"?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-12 14:33 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
@ 2011-12-12 14:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  2011-12-12 16:29 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2011-12-12 16:37 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-12-12 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-12-12 14:32:55 UTC ---
Easy


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-12 14:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2011-12-12 16:29 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
  2011-12-12 16:37 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at @ 2011-12-12 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #9 from Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at> 2011-12-12 16:17:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The problem still exists, but classpath is maintained upstream, not by GCC.

Checking out the GNU classpath project from savannah (CVS HEAD), there is
neither "-bnoerok" nor "-bernotok" nor "-berok" inside any file, nor a file
ltcf-cxx.sh at all, so where does it come from (it's still in gcc-4.7
snapshots)?

Or what/where/who is "classpath upstream"?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/46887] Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok'
  2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-12-12 16:29 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
@ 2011-12-12 16:37 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
  10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-12-12 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46887

--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-12 16:29:03 UTC ---
Has GCC/GCJ imported a recent version of classpath?  The "bug" may be that the
classpath package is not up to date in libjava.  In fact, the file may not be
used at all and solely a remnant that was not removed in a previous update.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-12 16:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-10 16:46 [Bug target/46887] New: Invalid AIX linker flag '-bnoerok', it has to be '-bernotok' michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
2010-12-13 16:47 ` [Bug target/46887] " rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-13 22:19 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
2011-02-28 17:11 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-02  5:49 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-09 16:03 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
2011-12-10 20:38 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-10 21:05 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-12 14:33 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
2011-12-12 14:41 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-12-12 16:29 ` michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at
2011-12-12 16:37 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).