From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4732 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2010 18:50:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 4723 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2010 18:49:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:49:55 +0000 From: "asharif at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/46895] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/max-stack-align.c X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: asharif at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:50:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01470.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46895 --- Comment #5 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-13 18:49:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Yeah, if #c2 tests what the test meant to test, then it is much preferrable > > over the thing that got committed, which has lots of issues. > > Sorry about the trunk breakage. I reverted the testcase. Yes, it was meant for > x86-64. I'll fix the testcase and repost a patch to the mailing list. > > Reverted in r167756. Update: The test doesn't do what #c3 is doing. The test is supposed to fail with this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=153780 and pass otherwise. That patch limits the alignment to MAX_SUPPORTED_STACK_ALIGNMENT. The test described in #c3 will still pass with that patch. As far as the uninitialized variables are concerned, I can set them all to 0 and it doesn't affect whether the test passes or fails. Can you assign this bug to me? Also, can I submit my patch with the lp64 dejaGNU filter? Thanks!