From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-340389-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17625 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2010 09:24:12 -0000
Received: (qmail 17616 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2010 09:24:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:24:07 +0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/46904] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/(indir-call-prof.C|inline_mismatch_args.C) fail on powerpc-apple-darwin9
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Target Status Last reconfirmed CC Host Ever Confirmed Build
Message-ID: <bug-46904-4-AmXkVRC1JL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46904-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:24:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01372.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46904

Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9       |*-apple-darwin9
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2010.12.13 09:23:54
                 CC|                            |hubicka at ucw dot cz
               Host|powerpc-apple-darwin9       |*-apple-darwin9
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
              Build|powerpc-apple-darwin9       |*-apple-darwin9

--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-13 09:23:54 UTC ---
this also appears on i686-darwin9.

the weak symbol errors appear with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-11/msg00974.html

I guess, if a symbol is artificially weakened - then one must recall
section_for_xxxxx() because, at least on Darwin, weak symbols can only appear
in [linker] coalesce-able sections.

Honza?