From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10109 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2010 21:37:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 10056 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2010 21:37:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:37:43 +0000 From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/46916] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-[1,2].c ICEs compiler due to r167727 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Attachment #22768 is obsolete Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:37:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg01825.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916 Iain Sandoe changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #22768|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #69 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-15 21:37:22 UTC --- Created attachment 22777 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22777 updated darwin candidate function sect. patch OK, I've added a hack that (hopefully) gets around the multiple .eh symbol issues. >>From my testing so far, there do not seem to be any "no symbols ... " warnings generated .. (there are some dsymutil warnings in the torture suite, because that does not use the prune facility AFAICT) This is a candidate for solving PR46916 + PR46904. I will test on *-darwin9 .. ... would be interested to see how it behaves on x86_64-d10.