From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-341116-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5505 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2010 13:50:59 -0000
Received: (qmail 5491 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2010 13:50:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:50:55 +0000
From: "howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/46916] gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-[1,2].c ICEs compiler due to r167727
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46916-4-DUBLBPypjN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46916-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:50:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg02099.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46916

--- Comment #88 from Jack Howarth <howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu> 2010-12-17 13:50:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #85)
> Created attachment 22787 [details]
> updated #2 darwin candidate function sect. patch
> 
> 
>   o  I think that the "no debug symbols" is down to missing pub sections....
> investigating.
> 
...
> 
>   o .. so at the moment Darwin10 fails on partition2.C ... for the reasons
> above.
> 

Iain,
   Do you think the "no debug symbols" warnings in the partition2.C test case
on darwin10 are the caused by the same issue (lack of pub symbols) as those
additional instances caused by honza'a patch? Also, do we see any additional
failures beyond those warnings when honza'a patch is added onto this current
darwin patch?