From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-341144-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11126 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2010 17:11:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 11107 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Dec 2010 17:11:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:11:28 +0000
From: "regehr at cs dot utah.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/46939] http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320 example 6
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: regehr at cs dot utah.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-46939-4-TSx5dOc0me@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-46939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-46939-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:11:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg02127.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46939

--- Comment #8 from John Regehr <regehr at cs dot utah.edu> 2010-12-17 17:11:05 UTC ---
Here is the current performance that we measure, in cycles:

gcc-head: 43
icc: 41
clang-head: 41
suncc: 42