public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/46942] x86_64 parameter passing unnecessary sign/zero extends Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:13:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-46942-4-QBWPq2KVYK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-46942-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-14 17:13:19 UTC --- __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) unsigned long f1 (unsigned int a, int b, unsigned short c, short d, unsigned char e, signed char f) { return (unsigned long) a + b + c + d + e + f; } unsigned long l; unsigned long f2 (void) { return f1 (l + 41, l + 41, l + 41, l + 41, l + 41, l + 41) + 1; } unsigned long f3 (unsigned int a, int b, unsigned short c, short d, unsigned char e, signed char f) { return f1 (a, b, c, d, e, f); } unsigned long f4 (int a, unsigned int b, short c, unsigned short d, signed char e, unsigned char f) { return f1 (a, b, c, d, e, f); } at -O2 shows in f4 that we can't trust that the sign/zero extension is done on the caller side, at least we can't trust that it is sign/zero extended into 64-bits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-14 17:13 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-12-14 16:50 [Bug target/46942] New: " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-14 17:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2010-12-14 17:26 ` [Bug target/46942] " joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-12-16 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02 17:58 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-02 17:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-02 19:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-02 20:53 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-01-03 14:23 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-03-25 20:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-28 16:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-08 3:42 ` meadori at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-46942-4-QBWPq2KVYK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).