From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-341292-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15716 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2010 11:58:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 15704 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Dec 2010 11:58:47 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:58:43 +0000
From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/47000] [4.5 Regression] Failure to inline SSE intrinsics
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47000-4-fXIwl8Rm8v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47000-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:58:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg02275.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47000

--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-19 11=
:58:35 UTC ---
sha256_4way.c:287:78: warning: called from here
sha256_4way.c:50:23: warning: inlining failed in call to =E2=80=98ROTR=E2=
=80=99: --param
inline-unit-growth limit reached

so you could also workaround with --param inline-unit-growth=3D<some suffic=
iently
large number>.
Otherwise H.J.'s proposed backport seems like most sane way to solve the
problem.  I guess it can be backported.


I am testing
Index: tree-inline.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
--- tree-inline.c       (revision 168047)
+++ tree-inline.c       (working copy)
@@ -3281,6 +3281,7 @@ estimate_operator_cost (enum tree_code c
     CASE_CONVERT:
     case COMPLEX_EXPR:
     case PAREN_EXPR:
+    case VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR:
       return 0;

     /* Assign cost of 1 to usual operations.

to solve the V_C_E problems.