public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct @ 2010-12-22 10:06 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-22 10:17 ` [Bug fortran/47040] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-22 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 Summary: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org Found at http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/3f6348b03eaed435 The error message: call print( [ ] ) 1 Error: Empty array constructor at (1) is not allowed is misleading at only empty array constructors without typespec are invalid. Thus, the following is valid: call print( [ real :: ] ) Expect: Error message: "Error: Empty array constructor at (1) is not allowed without type-spec" or "Error: Empty array constructor without type-spec at (1) is not allowed" F2008: R468 array-constructor is (/ ac-spec /) or lbracket ac-spec rbracket R469 ac-spec is type-spec :: or [type-spec ::] ac-value-list "An empty sequence forms a zero-sized array." ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct 2010-12-22 10:06 [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-22 10:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-22 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-22 10:16:56 UTC --- Draft patch - feel free to take it, I am not sure when I have the time to submit it. --- a/gcc/fortran/array.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/array.c @@ -1054,7 +1054,8 @@ gfc_match_array_constructor (gfc_expr **result) goto done; else { - gfc_error ("Empty array constructor at %C is not allowed"); + gfc_error ("Empty array constructor without type-spec at %C is not " + "allowed"); goto cleanup; } } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct 2010-12-22 10:06 [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-22 10:17 ` [Bug fortran/47040] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 20:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-26 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- Still there two years and a half later at revision 200429. What is wrong with the patch in comment #1? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct 2010-12-22 10:06 [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-22 10:17 ` [Bug fortran/47040] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 20:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 20:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > Still there two years and a half later at revision 200429. What is wrong > with the patch in comment #1? Nothing - it just needs to be packaged. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct 2010-12-22 10:06 [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2013-06-26 20:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-06-26 20:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-26 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > Nothing - it just needs to be packaged. Do you want me to do it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-26 20:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-12-22 10:06 [Bug fortran/47040] New: Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-22 10:17 ` [Bug fortran/47040] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 19:06 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-26 20:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-06-26 20:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).