* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-29 0:40 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 11:20 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-29 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-netbsd, arm-pe |arm-netbsd, arm-pe,
| |arm-wince-pe
Summary|arm-netbsd fails to build |non-elf arm targets fail to
| |build
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-29 00:40:32 UTC ---
The arm-pe / arm-wince-pe targets are saddled with another unused function:
../../../gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:4874:1: error:
‘arm_handle_notshared_attribute’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
Declaration and definition depend on TARGET_DLLIMPORT_DECL_ATTRIBUTES, but the
only use also depends on !defined(ARM_PE), and the declaration has no
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED marker.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 0:40 ` [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail " amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-29 11:20 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-12-29 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2010-12-29 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2010-12-29 11:20:39 UTC ---
arm-netbsd appears unmaintained. Apart from the desirability of moving
NetBSD to EABI, there's a clear bogosity in arm/netbsd.h I noticed a while
back:
/* Although not normally relevant (since by default, all aggregates
are returned in memory) compiling some parts of libc requires
non-APCS style struct returns. */
#undef TARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY
That's a target hook, not a macro. The #define is in arm.c; the #undef
has no effect. Presumably a broken conversion from macros to hooks, not
noticed for lack of anyone using recent GCC for this target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 0:40 ` [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail " amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 11:20 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2010-12-29 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-29 16:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-29 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-29 16:02:12 UTC ---
Joern, can you create a meta-bug to track the various non-building target
configurations? It would be nice to have a single place for an overview
(and a possible list of targets to deprecate).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-29 16:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-29 16:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2010-12-29 17:34 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2010-12-29 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2010-12-29 16:11:10 UTC ---
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> (and a possible list of targets to deprecate).
I gave my own suggestions for deprecations in
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01165.html> - there are some
overlaps with the non-building targets (Interix, some a.out BSD, crosses
to alpha*-dec-osf5.1* without GNU as don't build).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-29 16:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2010-12-29 17:34 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-30 16:45 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-29 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-29 17:34:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Joern, can you create a meta-bug to track the various non-building target
> configurations? It would be nice to have a single place for an overview
> (and a possible list of targets to deprecate).
I've created PR47093 for that.
When the build merely hit a -werror-always issue, I made the PR block 44756,
and PR 44756 blocks PR47093.
Of course, a --enable-werror-always issue might mask a hard failure later on.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-29 17:34 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-30 16:45 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-10 12:25 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-26 10:56 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-30 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
--- Comment #6 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-30 16:44:55 UTC ---
I've posted a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01980.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-30 16:45 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-10 12:25 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-02-26 10:56 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-10 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-netbsd, arm-pe, |arm-netbsd
|arm-wince-pe |
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-10 12:25:01 UTC ---
arm-pe and arm-wince-pe targets have now been removed from GCC.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47091] non-elf arm targets fail to build
2010-12-29 0:31 [Bug target/47091] New: arm-netbsd fails to build amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-10 12:25 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-02-26 10:56 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-02-26 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #8 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke <amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-02-26 10:56:05 UTC ---
I can't see from the ChangeLogs or svn logs of config.sub / config.gcc when
it happened, but configure now says arm-netbsd is not supported, so closing
this as WONTFIX.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread