public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
@ 2010-12-31 23:55 bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-01 8:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bigotp at acm dot org @ 2010-12-31 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Summary: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in
loop-invariant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: bigotp@acm.org
While updating the msp430 back-end, I've discovered that the problem fixed in
trunk in revision 158175 bites me as well in 4.4.x and 4.5.x. This is a
request to back-port the corresponding fix to gcc-4_4-branch and
gcc-4_5-branch.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
@ 2011-01-01 8:47 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-01 8:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-01 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot
| |gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot
| |gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-01 08:47:45 UTC ---
This is
2010-04-09 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>
* loop-invariant.c (replace_uses): New static function.
(move_invariant_reg): Use it to ensure we can replace the uses.
We would need a testcase though.
RMs, what do you think?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-01 8:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-01 8:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 17:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-01 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.01.01 08:48:35
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-01 8:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-01 8:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-02 17:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 18:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-02 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-02 17:50:02 UTC ---
The rev. doesn't have a testcase (and it didn't fix a bug?).
If you have a testcase that shows this patch fixes a regression it is ok
to backport. If it fixes a wrong-code bug then it is also ok to backport
if you have a testcase.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-02 17:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-02 18:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 18:33 ` bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-03 8:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-02 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-02 18:18:23 UTC ---
> The rev. doesn't have a testcase (and it didn't fix a bug?).
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00056.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-02 18:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-02 18:33 ` bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-03 8:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bigotp at acm dot org @ 2011-01-02 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
--- Comment #4 from Peter A. Bigot <bigotp at acm dot org> 2011-01-02 18:33:21 UTC ---
Exactly: this problem also occurs with the TI msp430 target machine
description, currently maintained as a fork on the mspgcc project on
sourceforge. I don't know how to provide a test case other than a tar file and
patch that adds that target, and a demonstration that without the referenced
change build of libgcc fails with unrecognized instruction patterns (a parallel
clobber didn't get updated, and the assert at the bottom of
cfgrtl.c:patch_jump_insn gets hit when redirect_jump fails on a target that
isn't an exit block).
On further reflection, since this is fixed in trunk and the msp430 target
wouldn't be back-ported into your repository for an existing release series,
I'm ok with closing this as not-worth-fixing. I did, however, want an upstream
problem report on which to hang the patches that I'll be maintaining.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-02 18:33 ` bigotp at acm dot org
@ 2011-01-03 8:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-03 8:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-03 08:05:07 UTC ---
Let's be conservative.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-03 8:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-31 23:55 [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] New: backport r158175: replace dominated uses in loop-invariant bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-01 8:47 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/47138] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-01 8:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 17:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 18:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-02 18:33 ` bigotp at acm dot org
2011-01-03 8:05 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).