From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27806 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2011 15:54:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 27797 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2011 15:54:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_JL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:54:29 +0000 From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/47142] incorrect libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll install X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:54:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00668.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47142 --- Comment #7 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-04 15:54:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > My next complete building will be started at 23:50 PM(UTC), if I got different > > answer, I will inform you. > > OOPS, libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll installed OK. But the other files installation is > wrong. > > oracle@vc:~/gcc-4.6-windows$ find . -name *.dll | grep -v pthread | sort > ./bin/libgfortran-3.dll > ./bin/libgomp-1.dll > ./bin/libobjc-3.dll > ./bin/libquadmath-0.dll > ./bin/libssp-0.dll > ./bin/libstdc++-6.dll > ./lib64/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll > ./lib/libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll Hmm, did you rebuild target libraries, or did you reused existing build-tree? > PS: For windows users, I think 32bit DLLs should go to bin/, and 64bit DLLs > should > go to bin/64/ . No. As agreement it is ok to install for a none-multilib native build the host DLLs into bin. But for multilib it should go into lib. I dislike the feature of installing host DLLs into bin folder pretty much.