From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30728 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2011 17:27:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 30717 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2011 17:27:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:27:51 +0000 From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/47145] [4.6 Regression] cross-compilation fails with "cannot check for file existence when cross compiling" X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:27:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00292.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145 Benjamin Kosnik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-01-04 17:27:36 UTC --- Kai looks good, sorry about the cross breakage: please check in your fix. My connectivity is somewhat flaky till the 5th. What's being checked for (pure form) is xsltproc + specific version of the HTML style sheets, which should be local and vendor supplied if possible so that the toolchain doesn't fall down later in the process. What's being checked for now is the existence of the stylesheet file. This seems reasonable at present time to get over the hump wrt doc rules, but should be made more robust later. FWIW, Doc patches for release are reasonable for stage 3 or whatever we call right after stage 1 now, just like spec patches. Chill.