[Bug tree-optimization/47148] [4.6 Regression] likely wrong code bug

["jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47148

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.01.01 20:07:21
          Component|c                           |tree-optimization
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
            Summary|likely wrong code bug       |[4.6 Regression] likely
                   |                            |wrong code bug
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-01 20:07:21 UTC ---
/* PR tree-optimization/47148 */

static inline unsigned
bar (unsigned x, unsigned y)
{
  if (y >= 32)
    return x;
  else
    return x >> y;
}

static unsigned a = 1, b = 1;

static inline void
foo (unsigned char x, unsigned y)
{
  if (!y)
    return;
  unsigned c = (0x7000U / (x - 2)) ^ a;
  unsigned d = bar (a, a);
  b &= ((a - d) && (a - 1)) + c;
}

int
main (void)
{
  foo (1, 1);
  foo (-1, 1);
  if (b && ((unsigned char) -1) == 255)
    __builtin_abort ();
  return 0;
}

Indeed, seems to be caused by partial inlining.  With -fno-partial-inlining it
works fine.