public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration
@ 2011-01-05 18:56 zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-05-25 15:48 ` [Bug c++/47184] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: zeratul976 at hotmail dot com @ 2011-01-05 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Summary: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as
function declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zeratul976@hotmail.com
For the following code:
struct S
{
int a;
float b;
};
struct T
{
T(S s) {}
};
int main()
{
T t(S{1, 0.1}); // ERROR HERE
}
gcc 4.6 trunk gives the following errors (with the --std=c++0x option):
decl.cpp: In function 'int main()':
decl.cpp:14:10: error: expected ')' before '{' token
decl.cpp:14:10: error: a function-definition is not allowed here before '{'
token
decl.cpp:14:18: error: expected primary-expression before ')' token
decl.cpp:14:18: error: expected ';' before ')' token
It seems gcc is interpreting the statement as a function declaration.
I think this is valid C++0x.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47184] gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
@ 2011-05-25 15:48 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 19:52 ` [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-25 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011.05.25 15:42:06
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-05-25 15:48 ` [Bug c++/47184] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-25 19:52 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 20:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-25 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-25 19:50:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 19:50:49 2011
New Revision: 174225
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174225
Log:
PR c++/47184
* parser.c (cp_parser_parameter_declaration): Recognize
list-initialization.
(cp_parser_direct_declarator): Check for the closing
paren before parsing definitely.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist51.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-05-25 15:48 ` [Bug c++/47184] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 19:52 ` [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-25 20:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 13:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 14:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-25 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-25 20:29:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 20:29:39 2011
New Revision: 174232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174232
Log:
PR c++/47184
* parser.c (cp_parser_parameter_declaration): Recognize
list-initialization.
(cp_parser_direct_declarator): Check for the closing
paren before parsing definitely.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/initlist51.C
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cp/parser.c
branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-25 20:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-26 13:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 14:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-26 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-26 13:44:35 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.6.1.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-05-26 13:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-05-26 14:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-26 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-26 13:48:25 UTC ---
...and actually change status.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-26 13:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-05 18:56 [Bug c++/47184] New: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declaration zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-05-25 15:48 ` [Bug c++/47184] " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 19:52 ` [Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 20:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 13:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-26 14:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).