public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
@ 2011-01-06 19:41 hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-01-06 21:10 ` [Bug fortran/47195] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-06 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Summary: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: hjl.tools@gmail.com
CC: franke.daniel@gmail.com
On Linux/ia32, revision 168545 gave:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90 -O (test for errors, line 14)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
Revision 168539 is OK. They are caused by revision 168542:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-01/msg00159.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47195] [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-06 21:10 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-06 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011.01.06 20:13:09
CC| |dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47195] [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-01-06 21:10 ` [Bug fortran/47195] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-06 21:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-06 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-06 20:17:24 UTC ---
That's the following patch. The third failure is for the file added by the
committal.
gcc/fortran/:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
PR fortran/33117
PR fortran/46478
* parse.c (parse_interface): Remove check for procedure types.
* interface.c (check_interface0): Verify that procedures are
either all SUBROUTINEs or all FUNCTIONs.
gcc/testsuite/:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
PR fortran/33117
PR fortran/46478
* gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47195] [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-01-06 21:10 ` [Bug fortran/47195] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-06 21:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-06 21:53 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2011-01-06 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-01-06 21:09:58 UTC ---
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
This is fixed by the following patch:
--- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90 2011-01-06
17:59:52.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90 2011-01-06 22:07:48.000000000
+0100
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-! { dg-do "compile" }
+! { dg-do compile }
!
! PR fortran/33117, PR fortran/46478
! Procedures of a generic interface must be either
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
!
module m1
interface gen
- subroutine sub() ! dg-error { "all SUBROUTINEs or all
FUNCTIONs" }
+ subroutine sub() ! { dg-error "all SUBROUTINEs or all
FUNCTIONs" }
end subroutine sub
function bar()
real :: bar
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ MODULE m2
MODULE PROCEDURE subr_name
END INTERFACE
CONTAINS
- LOGICAL FUNCTION func_name() ! dg-error { "all SUBROUTINEs or all
FUNCTIONs" }
+ LOGICAL FUNCTION func_name() ! { dg-error "all SUBROUTINEs or all
FUNCTIONs" }
END FUNCTION
SUBROUTINE subr_name()
END SUBROUTINE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47195] [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-06 21:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2011-01-06 21:53 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-06 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-06 21:42:56 UTC ---
Author: dfranke
Date: Thu Jan 6 21:42:53 2011
New Revision: 168554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168554
Log:
2011-01-06 Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
PR fortran/47195
* gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90: Fixed dg-error declarations.
* gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90: Split the subroutine
from the interface of functions to not hide the errors that
shall be tested.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/defined_operators_1.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_33.f90
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47195] [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-06 21:53 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-06 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-06 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47195
Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-06 21:44:28 UTC ---
Committed the fixes as obvious. ML-notification to follow. Sorry for the
breakage and thanks for noticing!
Closing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-06 21:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-06 19:41 [Bug fortran/47195] New: [4.6 regression] New Fortran test failures hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-01-06 21:10 ` [Bug fortran/47195] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:43 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-06 21:53 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-06 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).