From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-343181-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22720 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2011 23:15:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 22434 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2011 23:15:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:14:59 +0000
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/47239] [4.6 Regression] (int)&func & 3 is always optimized to 0 on some targets
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47239-4-17putJfJfE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:17:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01120.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239

--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-11 23:14:45 UTC ---
I've tried 168661 with arm, hppa and sh64 cc1's. The problem
has gone away on all these 3 targets.  Thanks!