From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25004 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2011 22:18:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 24990 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Jan 2011 22:18:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:18:39 +0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47240] [F03] segfault with procedure pointer component X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01206.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-01-12 22:18:35 UTC --- > I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with both -m32 and > -m64. I confirm that the ICE is not due to the patch. > Regarding the test case: I think it is invalid: I have never said that it was valid (it is not mine and you have probably recognized the style!-). Nevertheless there was no ICE at revision 168625 (I saw it at revision 168653) and even invalid codes should not give ICE.