public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47240] [F03] segfault with procedure pointer component Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:34:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-47240-4-gSgodFYnnS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-47240-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 20:27:29 UTC --- Reduced test case: type t procedure (fun), pointer, nopass :: p end type type(t) :: x x%p => fun print *, evaluate (x%p) contains real function fun () fun = 0 end function real function evaluate ( dummy ) procedure(fun) :: dummy evaluate = dummy () end function end Like the original test case, this gives a segfault at runtime. Looking at the dump, the wrong part is D.1540 = evaluate (&x.p); We should not take the address of x.p here, but just pass it as is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 20:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-01-10 9:10 [Bug fortran/47240] New: " m.a.hulsen at tue dot nl 2011-01-10 9:37 ` [Bug fortran/47240] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 10:54 ` [Bug fortran/47240] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-10 20:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2011-01-10 21:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 11:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 14:23 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-11 14:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-11 23:15 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-12 21:00 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 21:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-12 21:54 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 22:40 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-13 6:25 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13 18:58 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-01-18 23:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 23:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19 8:57 ` m.a.hulsen at tue dot nl
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-47240-4-gSgodFYnnS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).