From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24034 invoked by alias); 25 May 2011 14:52:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 24024 invoked by uid 22791); 25 May 2011 14:52:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 14:52:42 +0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/47277] [C++0x] pseudo destructor code that cause an internal compiler error with std=gnu++0x X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:15:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02389.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47277 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05= -25 14:52:26 UTC --- Very likely due to the fix for c++/48935, we don't ICE anymore. However, as= I noticed when I tried to fix this one, we always print: =E2=80=98main()::e::~e=E2=80=99 in the error message for line #4, that is, there is code in the front-end w= hich disregards the actual '~e_u()'. Should this be improved as part of these PR= s?