public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
@ 2011-01-17 21:15 zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-01-17 22:26 ` [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: zeratul976 at hotmail dot com @ 2011-01-17 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Summary: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: zeratul976@hotmail.com
For the following code:
struct A
{
template <typename T>
int f(T);
};
template <typename T>
auto g(T x) -> decltype(A().f(x));
void h() { g(0); }
gcc trunk gives the error:
test.cpp: In function ‘void h()’:
test.cpp:10: sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload
As far as I can tell, this is valid C++0x code.
Are there any plans to implement this? I wasn't able to find an existing bug
about it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
@ 2011-01-17 22:26 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-05-23 16:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-01-17 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|"sorry, unimplemented: |[C++0x] "sorry,
|mangling overload" |unimplemented: mangling
| |overload"
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-01-17 21:42:56 UTC ---
Let's ask Jason. In case, not earlier than 4.7.0, I suppose...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-01-17 22:26 ` [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2011-05-23 16:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-10 19:55 ` dave at boostpro dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-05-23 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lenx99 at yahoo dot com.cn
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-23 15:46:49 UTC ---
*** Bug 49044 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-01-17 22:26 ` [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-05-23 16:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-12-10 19:55 ` dave at boostpro dot com
2011-12-10 20:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 17:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dave at boostpro dot com @ 2011-12-10 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Dave Abrahams <dave at boostpro dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dave at boostpro dot com
--- Comment #3 from Dave Abrahams <dave at boostpro dot com> 2011-12-10 19:20:24 UTC ---
I believe this should be a duplicate of bug 48051, not bug 49044... as that one
is closed solving just the ICE problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-12-10 19:55 ` dave at boostpro dot com
@ 2011-12-10 20:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 17:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-12-10 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-10 19:54:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I believe this should be a duplicate of bug 48051, not bug 49044... as that one
> is closed solving just the ICE problem.
bug 49044 is closed as a dup of *this* bug, but this may well be the same issue
as bug 48051 - Jason, any reason to keep both open?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload"
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-12-10 20:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-02 17:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2012-01-02 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-01-02 17:48:45 UTC ---
Closing as duplicate of 48051. If I'm doing something wrong, please re-open,
and sorry ;)
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 48051 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-02 17:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-17 21:15 [Bug c++/47335] New: "sorry, unimplemented: mangling overload" zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
2011-01-17 22:26 ` [Bug c++/47335] [C++0x] " paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-05-23 16:20 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-10 19:55 ` dave at boostpro dot com
2011-12-10 20:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 17:51 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).