From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4043 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 12:01:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 3505 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2013 12:01:29 -0000 From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/47344] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][meta-bug] GCC gets slower and uses more memory Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog, meta-bug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47344 Steven Bosscher changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2013-03-06 12:01:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > All these regressions clutter the list of important regressions. And why would all of these not be important? Hiding a problem is not solving the problem. And it always was policy that a regression should be marked as such. If it is not important enough, you can set its priority to P4 or P5, but we should never remove the regression marker. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-12/msg00550.html