public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
@ 2011-01-18 21:32 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19  0:55 ` [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-18 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

           Summary: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
                CC: janus@gcc.gnu.org


Found at
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bbaf59ffd7c372e9#
 (There is another issue in that thread)

The following program causes an ICE with gfortran in:

==779== Invalid read of size 1
==779==    at 0x58B717: gfc_conv_expr_reference (trans-expr.c:4839)
==779==    by 0x5A400B: gfc_trans_transfer (trans-io.c:2328)
==779==    by 0x565607: trans_code (trans.c:1371)


Reduced (and w/o comments) full test case:

module mytypes
   implicit none
   abstract interface
      function f(x)
         real f, x
      end function f
!      function g(x)
!         integer g, x
!      end function g
   end interface
   procedure(f),pointer,save :: f1
!   procedure(g),pointer,save :: g1
   interface gen
      procedure f1!,g1
   end interface gen
end module mytypes

!module funcs
!   implicit none
!   contains
!      function f(x)
!         real f, x
!         f = 3*x
!      end function f
!      function g(x)
!         integer g, x
!         g = 3*x
!      end function g
!end module funcs

program test
   use mytypes
!   use funcs, f2=>f, g2=>g
   implicit none

!   f1 => f2
!   g1 => g2
!   write(*,*) gen(1)
   write(*,*) gen(1.0)
end program test


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-19  0:55 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19 16:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-19  0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.01.18 23:39:08
            Summary|ICE with proc-pointers in   |[F03] ICE with
                   |generic procedures          |proc-pointers in generic
                   |                            |procedures
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-18 23:39:08 UTC ---
Confirmed. Note: The ICE already happens with a simple PROCEDURE statement
without the POINTER attribute:


   implicit none

   abstract interface
      real function f()
      end function f
   end interface

   procedure(f) :: f1

   interface gen
      procedure f1
   end interface gen

   write(*,*) gen()    ! ICE
end


At first I was not quite sure if the code in comment #0 is valid, but F08
chapter 12.4.3.4.1 explicitly lists procedure pointers as being allowed in a
generic interface.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19  0:55 ` [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-19 16:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19 21:38 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-19 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-19 15:58:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Found at http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/bbaf59ffd7c372e9#
>  (There is another issue in that thread)

The other issue involving proc-pointer components and a GENERIC type-bound
procedure is now tracked as PR 47360.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19  0:55 ` [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-19 16:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-19 21:38 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-22  0:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-19 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-19 21:21:30 UTC ---
Simple patch to avoid the ICE:

Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c    (revision 168973)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c    (working copy)
@@ -4827,7 +4827,7 @@ gfc_conv_expr_reference (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * e
     }

   if (expr->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION
-      && ((expr->value.function.esym
+      && ((expr->value.function.esym && expr->value.function.esym->result
        && expr->value.function.esym->result->attr.pointer
        && !expr->value.function.esym->result->attr.dimension)
       || (!expr->value.function.esym


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-19 21:38 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-22  0:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-22 20:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-22  0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-21 23:01:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Simple patch to avoid the ICE:

The patch in comment #3 regtests without problems. However, I'm not sure if
it's the best solution. Here is an alternative:

Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (revision 169052)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (working copy)
@@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ resolve_procedure_interface (gfc_symbol *sym)
       sym->attr.function = ifc->attr.function;
       sym->attr.subroutine = ifc->attr.subroutine;
       gfc_copy_formal_args (sym, ifc);
+      if (sym->attr.function)
+       sym->result = sym;

       sym->attr.allocatable = ifc->attr.allocatable;
       sym->attr.pointer = ifc->attr.pointer;


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-22  0:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-22 20:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-09 22:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-22 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-22 17:48:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (revision 169052)
> +++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c       (working copy)
> @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ resolve_procedure_interface (gfc_symbol *sym)
>        sym->attr.function = ifc->attr.function;
>        sym->attr.subroutine = ifc->attr.subroutine;
>        gfc_copy_formal_args (sym, ifc);
> +      if (sym->attr.function)
> +       sym->result = sym;
> 
>        sym->attr.allocatable = ifc->attr.allocatable;
>        sym->attr.pointer = ifc->attr.pointer;


This one also regtests cleanly, and I think it is preferable over the previous
one.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-22 20:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 22:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-09 23:00 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-09 23:22 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 22:00:21 UTC ---
Here is yet another variant:

Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c    (revision 169985)
+++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c    (working copy)
@@ -160,7 +160,10 @@ resolve_procedure_interface (gfc_symbol *sym)
     resolve_intrinsic (ifc, &ifc->declared_at);

       if (ifc->result)
-    sym->ts = ifc->result->ts;
+    {
+      sym->ts = ifc->result->ts;
+      sym->result = sym;
+    }
       else   
     sym->ts = ifc->ts;
       sym->ts.interface = ifc;


This has basically the same effect as the one in comment #4, but it'a a bit
clearer.

I'd even say it's pretty much obvious in this form. Will commit after
regtesting.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-09 22:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 23:00 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-09 23:22 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 22:59:08 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Feb  9 22:59:02 2011
New Revision: 169987

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169987
Log:
2011-02-09  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/47352
    * resolve.c (resolve_procedure_interface): If interface has a result
    variable, copy the typespec and set result pointer to self.


2011-02-09  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

    PR fortran/47352
    * gfortran.dg/proc_decl_25.f90: New.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_decl_25.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures
  2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-09 23:00 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 23:22 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47352

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-09 23:00:30 UTC ---
Fixed with r169987. Closing.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-09 23:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-18 21:32 [Bug fortran/47352] New: ICE with proc-pointers in generic procedures burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-19  0:55 ` [Bug fortran/47352] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-19 16:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-19 21:38 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-22  0:34 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-22 20:57 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 22:21 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 23:00 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 23:22 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).