From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-344463-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17463 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2011 22:39:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 17452 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Jan 2011 22:39:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 23 Jan 2011 22:39:44 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/47425] New: Array constructor with type-spec: Fails with more complicated length type expr
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47425-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 00:57:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02402.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47425

           Summary: Array constructor with type-spec: Fails with more
                    complicated length type expr
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org


http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/397b3520a4dd1a9f#

James Van Buskirk found an example for an Array constructor with type-spec,
which fails at gimpling. Full example: See c.l.f. Short example:

subroutine sub1(L,s,e)
   implicit none
   character(*) L
   integer s,e
   if(any(L(s:e+1) == [character(len(L(s:e))+1)::'that','those'])) then
   end if
end subroutine sub1

Gives:

test.f90:5:0: error: size of variable 'A.1' is too large

Looking at the dump, one sees that the character length is strangely optimized
away into two uninitialized variables. The dump has:


sub1 (character(kind=1)[1:_l] & restrict l, integer(kind=4) & restrict s,
integer(kind=4) & restrict e, integer(kind=4) _l)
{
  bit_size_type D.1546;
  <unnamed-unsigned:64> D.1547;

  D.1546 = (bit_size_type) ((<unnamed-unsigned:64>) _l * 8);
  D.1547 = (<unnamed-unsigned:64>) (_l + -1) + 1;
  {
    static character(kind=1) A.1[2][1:MAX_EXPR <(D.1541 - D.1540) + 1, 0> + 1]
= {"that", "those"};

and only much later:

    D.1540 = *s;
    D.1541 = *e;