public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
@ 2011-01-24  5:29 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
  2011-01-24  8:53 ` [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: regehr at cs dot utah.edu @ 2011-01-24  5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

           Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst
                    in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: regehr@cs.utah.edu
                CC: chenyang@cs.utah.edu
              Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
            Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
             Build: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


[regehr@gamow tmp444]$ current-gcc -c -O3 small.c

small.c: In function 'foo':
small.c:22:12: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have
integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

[regehr@gamow tmp444]$ current-gcc -v

Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=current-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/uusoc/exports/scratch/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r169143-install/bin/../libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r169143-install
--program-prefix=r169143- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.0 20110123 (experimental) (GCC) 

[regehr@gamow tmp444]$ cat small.c


struct S2
{
  int f6;
};

int g_65;

struct S2 g_180;

void func_121 (struct S2 p_122);

int func_56 (int p_58, int p_59)
{
  int i;
  for (i = 0; i < 1; i = 1)
    for (p_59 = 0; p_59 < 1; p_59 = 1);
  return p_59;
}

void foo (void)
{
  func_106 (0);
}

int func_106 (const int p_107, int p_108)
{
  if (func_56 (func_56 (0, p_107), 0))
    return 0;
  else
    func_121 (g_180);
  return 0;
}

void func_121 (struct S2 p_122)
{
  for (0; 1; 0)
    for (; p_122.f6;)
      g_65 = 0 ? : func_56 (0,0);
}


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
@ 2011-01-24  8:53 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-01-24  9:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-24  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.01.24 05:32:15
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0
            Summary|ICE: tree check: expected   |[4.6 Regression] ICE: tree
                   |ssa_name, have integer_cst  |check: expected ssa_name,
                   |in copy_phis_for_bb, at     |have integer_cst in
                   |tree-inline.c:1986          |copy_phis_for_bb, at
                   |                            |tree-inline.c:1986
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2011-01-24 05:32:15 UTC ---
It is caused by revision 160124:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-06/msg00036.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
  2011-01-24  8:53 ` [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-24  9:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-24 12:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/47428] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-24  9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-24 09:45:47 UTC ---
Guess it is related to the implicit declaration of func_106 and too few
parameters passed to it.  Looking...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
  2011-01-24  8:53 ` [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2011-01-24  9:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-24 12:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-24 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-24 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-24 11:13:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 23095
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23095
gcc46-pr47428.patch

Untested fix.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-24 12:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/47428] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-24 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-25 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-24 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #23095|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-24 14:03:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23100
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23100
gcc46-pr47427.patch

Different untested fix.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-24 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-25 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-25 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-25 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 11:09:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 23100 [details]
> gcc46-pr47427.patch
> 
> Different untested fix.

Looks good.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-25 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-25 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-25 12:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-02 17:48 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-25 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 12:01:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 25 12:01:54 2011
New Revision: 169226

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169226
Log:
    PR tree-optimization/47427
    PR tree-optimization/47428
    * tree-ssa-copyrename.c (copy_rename_partition_coalesce): Don't
    coalesce if the new root var would be TREE_READONLY.

    * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47427.c: New test.
    * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47428.c: New test.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47427.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47428.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-copyrename.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-25 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-25 12:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-02 17:48 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-25 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 12:46:46 UTC ---
Fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/47428] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986
  2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-25 12:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-02 17:48 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-02 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47428

--- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo <dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-02 17:46:08 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Wed Feb  2 17:46:04 2011
New Revision: 169577

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169577
Log:
    PR tree-optimization/47427
    PR tree-optimization/47428
    * tree-ssa-copyrename.c (copy_rename_partition_coalesce): Don't
    coalesce if the new root var would be TREE_READONLY.

    * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47427.c: New test.
    * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47428.c: New test.

Added:
    branches/google/integration/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47427.c
    branches/google/integration/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr47428.c
Modified:
    branches/google/integration/gcc/ChangeLog
    branches/google/integration/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    branches/google/integration/gcc/tree-ssa-copyrename.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-02 17:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-24  5:29 [Bug c/47428] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in copy_phis_for_bb, at tree-inline.c:1986 regehr at cs dot utah.edu
2011-01-24  8:53 ` [Bug c/47428] [4.6 Regression] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2011-01-24  9:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-24 12:51 ` [Bug tree-optimization/47428] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-24 14:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 11:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 12:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 12:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-02 17:48 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).