From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-345015-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7692 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2011 13:08:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 7657 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2011 13:08:53 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_PG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:08:47 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/47434] Wrong field width for NaN with (F0.n) formatting
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-47434-4-rDLlbfeTds@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47434-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:30:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02954.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47434

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-27 13:08:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Regarding the other cases:
> Similarly for the '+' sign on Inf.  Until now we have chosen to emit the
> optional characters.

Comparison with other compilers for the example of comment 3.

a) Crayftn 7.2.4
  Infinity
Inf
      0.00
.00
      0.00
.00

b) ifort 11.1, PathScale 3.2.99, Open64 4.2.2.1, 
Infinity
Inf
0.00
.00
0.00
.00

c) Sun Fortran 95 8.3, pgf90 10.5-0
Inf
Inf
0.00
.00
0.00
.00

d) g95 4.03 (0.93)
+Inf
Inf
.00
.00
.00
.00

e) xlf95/AIX V12.1
INF
INF
0.00
.00
0.00
.00

f) NAG 5.1
        <<< Yes, that's an zero-length string
Inf
.00
.00
.00
.00

g) g77: Does not like w = 0 and prints "inf" (small "i"), and ".00" for the
other lines.