public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
@ 2011-01-25 13:30 vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:41 ` [Bug c++/47457] " vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: vas.gurevich at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-25 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
Summary: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from
explicitly optimised code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: vas.gurevich@gmail.com
Created attachment 23116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23116
preprocessed source
When build this code without optimisation, like that,
g++ -o optimizetest optimizetest.cpp
looks like function call from optimised function passes wrong parameters to
static inline function
#include <stdio.h>
static inline void bar(int a)
{
printf("%d\n", a);
}
void foo() __attribute__((optimize("O2")));
void foo()
{
int a = 10;
bar(a);
}
int main(int, char**)
{
foo();
return 0;
}
If compile with more than 0 optimisation level this works fine and prints 10,
otherwise when compile without optimisation this produces garbage instead of
10.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-25 13:41 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:46 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: vas.gurevich at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-25 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
--- Comment #1 from Vasily Gurevich <vas.gurevich at gmail dot com> 2011-01-25 13:23:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 23117
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23117
optimizetest.cpp
Source file
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:41 ` [Bug c++/47457] " vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-25 13:46 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:54 ` juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: vas.gurevich at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-25 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
--- Comment #2 from Vasily Gurevich <vas.gurevich at gmail dot com> 2011-01-25 13:24:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 23118
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23118
gcc -v output
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:41 ` [Bug c++/47457] " vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:46 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-25 13:54 ` juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com
2011-01-25 14:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com @ 2011-01-25 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
Juha Kallioinen <juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |juha.kallioinen at nokia
| |dot com
--- Comment #3 from Juha Kallioinen <juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com> 2011-01-25 13:41:42 UTC ---
Additional info: works on a 64bit Ubuntu Maverick (10.10) system, but not on a
32 bit one. Same problem with gcc-4.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-25 13:54 ` juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com
@ 2011-01-25 14:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 14:11 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-25 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #23116|application/octet-stream |text/plain
mime type| |
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 13:44:39 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 23116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23116
preprocessed source
this isn't preprocessed source, this is the assembler code
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-25 14:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-25 14:11 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 16:39 ` [Bug target/47457] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: vas.gurevich at gmail dot com @ 2011-01-25 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
--- Comment #5 from Vasily Gurevich <vas.gurevich at gmail dot com> 2011-01-25 13:51:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 23119
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23119
real preprocessed source
Excuse me, preprocessed source, just in case.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-25 14:11 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
@ 2011-01-25 16:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-25 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |i?86-*-linux
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.01.25 16:28:34
Component|c++ |target
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.4.4, 4.5.2, 4.6.0
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-25 16:28:34 UTC ---
Confirmed. I think this is a dup though.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/47457] g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-25 16:39 ` [Bug target/47457] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-08-30 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-08-30 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47457
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Keywords| |wrong-code
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Dup of bug 60062 which was fixed for GCC 4.8.3.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60062 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-30 1:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-25 13:30 [Bug c++/47457] New: g++ calls without optimisation incorrectly from explicitly optimised code vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:41 ` [Bug c++/47457] " vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:46 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 13:54 ` juha.kallioinen at nokia dot com
2011-01-25 14:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 14:11 ` vas.gurevich at gmail dot com
2011-01-25 16:39 ` [Bug target/47457] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-08-30 1:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).