public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/47463] [OOP] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-47463-4-1R2PeSFLlN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-47463-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47463

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-09 18:52:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> This line seems completely bogus to me. I have no idea what it's supposed to
> do. In any case it came from the following commit:

Cf. PR 42385 / http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=162313
which was committed by Paul.

I do not see whether the line makes sense or not. The idea seems to be to fix
not fully resolved TBP -- but it is not completely clear to me whether that is
ever needed in such a way. As the test case [cf. comment 9 (b)] shows, the
current way is definitely wrong.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-09 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25 19:33 [Bug fortran/47463] New: " townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
2011-01-25 20:33 ` [Bug fortran/47463] [OOP] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-25 20:53 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-27  5:33 ` townsend at astro dot wisc.edu
2011-01-30 16:01 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 10:48 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 12:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 15:13 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 18:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 21:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-02 18:25 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 18:11 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 18:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2011-02-09 20:24 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 20:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 20:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 21:10 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10  6:25 ` paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-47463-4-1R2PeSFLlN@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).