From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117019 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2015 16:03:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 116972 invoked by uid 48); 14 Oct 2015 16:03:21 -0000 From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47469] Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses TBP/PPC attributes Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01104.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Tobias' version is prettier! Does it apply without regressions? Obviously the patch in comment 0 no longer applies. Now finding 'gfc_expr_attr (expr2).pointer' prettier than 'expr2->symtree->n.sym->attr.pointer' is just a matter of taste (29 characters compared to 35). For a newbie like the later is easier to understand than the former. BTW what should it be for 'value.function.esym'?