public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/47494] New: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp
@ 2011-01-27 15:56 burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-27 15:58 ` [Bug fortran/47494] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-27 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494
Summary: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
At http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02012.html Simon Baldwin wrote:
Strict build environments do binary comparisons of files across gcc builds.
Writing the current timestamp into a Fortran .mod file leads to false
positives from such environments. Omitting the timestamp removes these
false positives.
That change was in Google's internal GCC - and is now pushed to the Google
branch in SVN.
One should consider to apply the patch also to the trunk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/47494] .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp 2011-01-27 15:56 [Bug fortran/47494] New: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-27 15:58 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 11:11 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 15:52 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-27 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-27 15:50:57 UTC --- Cf. also http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00250.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47494] .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp 2011-01-27 15:56 [Bug fortran/47494] New: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 15:58 ` [Bug fortran/47494] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-20 11:11 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 15:52 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jb at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-20 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494 Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.20 09:34:06 CC| |jb at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-20 09:34:06 UTC --- Confirmed. While AFAICS this is not a problem wrt removing the timestamp, one should make sure to not break the avoid-recompilation-cascade feature, see e.g. discussion in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47495 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/47494] .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp 2011-01-27 15:56 [Bug fortran/47494] New: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 15:58 ` [Bug fortran/47494] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 11:11 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-11-23 15:52 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: jb at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-11-23 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47494 Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist <jb at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-23 14:42:16 UTC --- Patch was committed to trunk on 2011-09-20. According to git annotate, the timestamp has been there since the original commit on 2004-05-13, so I don't think this is a regression, so no need to backport to other branches. Therefore, closing. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-23 14:42 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-01-27 15:56 [Bug fortran/47494] New: .MOD files: Consider removing the time stamp burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-27 15:58 ` [Bug fortran/47494] " burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 11:11 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-23 15:52 ` jb at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).