* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-eabi |arm-eabi,
| |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 14:45:45 UTC ---
Between 20110121 and 20110127, the test also started to FAIL on Solaris
11/SPARC
(both 32 and 64-bit):
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42918.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
xgcc: error: /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42918.c:
-fcompare-debug failure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 14:57:10 UTC ---
Likely the same problem as PR47498 and PR47501.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-30 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-eabi, |arm-eabi,
|sparc-sun-solaris2.11 |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
| |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.01.30 16:00:51
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-31 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-31 10:40:20 UTC ---
Alex (temporarily) reverted the patch on the trunk, can you verify this is gone
again?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-02 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-02 10:05:24 UTC ---
And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
this bug still exists with current trunk (r169513 or newer)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-02-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-02-03 10:13:18 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-02 10:05:24 UTC ---
> And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
> this bug still exists with current trunk (r169513 or newer)?
A sparc-sun-solaris2.10 bootstrap as of rev 169517 just completed
without regressions and both FAILs are gone. Same for mips-sgi-irix6.5.
Thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-03 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-03 10:16:58 UTC ---
And arm is fixed too at r169520:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-02/msg00297.html (earlier
gcc-testresults posts from the same reporter and the same targets showed the
problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg02674.html ).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread