public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
@ 2011-01-28 9:44 ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 more replies)
0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer
for pr42918.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ramana@gcc.gnu.org
Target: arm-eabi
Since last night I'm seeing this failure with -ftracer and -fcompare-debug on
arm-eabi
/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/2011-01-26/build-a9softfpneon/gcc2/gcc/xgcc
-B/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/2011-01-26/build-a9softfpneon/gcc2/gcc/
/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/source/gcc-fsf/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42918.c
-O2 -fcompare-debug -ftracer -DSTACK_SIZE=16384 -S -o pr42918.s (timeout = 800)
xgcc: error:
/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/source/gcc-fsf/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42918.c:
-fcompare-debug failure
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
xgcc: error:
/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/source/gcc-fsf/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42918.c:
-fcompare-debug failure
The difference in the .gkd files is :
-> 5) -> 5)
(note# 0 0 ("lab") NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL 3) <
(code_label 1 0 0 1 "" [1 uses]) (code_label 1 0
0 1 "" [1 uses])
(note# 0 0 [bb 4] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (note# 0 0 [bb
4] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(insn# 0 0 (use (reg/i:SI 0 r0)) /arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/s (insn# 0 0 (use
(reg/i:SI 0 r0)) /arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/s
(nil)) (nil))
(note# 0 0 NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG) (note# 0 0
NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG)
(jump_insn:TI# 0 0 (unspec_volatile [ (jump_insn:TI#
0 0 (unspec_volatile [
(return)
(return)
] 1) /arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/s ] 1)
/arm/scratch/pdtltest/work/sandboxes/fsf/trunk/s
(nil)) (nil))
(barrier 0 0 0) (barrier 0 0 0)
(code_label 5 0 0 5 "" [2 uses]) (code_label 5 0
0 5 "" [2 uses])
(note# 0 0 [bb 5] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (note# 0 0 [bb
5] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
> (note# 0 0
("lab") NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL 3)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 11:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-eabi |arm-eabi,
| |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
CC| |ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 14:45:45 UTC ---
Between 20110121 and 20110127, the test also started to FAIL on Solaris
11/SPARC
(both 32 and 64-bit):
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42918.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
xgcc: error: /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42918.c:
-fcompare-debug failure
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-28 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-28 14:57:10 UTC ---
Likely the same problem as PR47498 and PR47501.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-30 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|arm-eabi, |arm-eabi,
|sparc-sun-solaris2.11 |sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
| |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.01.30 16:00:51
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-31 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-31 10:40:20 UTC ---
Alex (temporarily) reverted the patch on the trunk, can you verify this is gone
again?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-02 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-02 10:05:24 UTC ---
And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
this bug still exists with current trunk (r169513 or newer)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2011-02-03 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-02-03 10:13:18 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-02 10:05:24 UTC ---
> And now a new version of that patch has been checked in. Can you verify if
> this bug still exists with current trunk (r169513 or newer)?
A sparc-sun-solaris2.10 bootstrap as of rev 169517 just completed
without regressions and both FAILs are gone. Same for mips-sgi-irix6.5.
Thanks.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47508] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-03 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47508
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-03 10:16:58 UTC ---
And arm is fixed too at r169520:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-02/msg00297.html (earlier
gcc-testresults posts from the same reporter and the same targets showed the
problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg02674.html ).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-03 10:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-28 9:44 [Bug debug/47508] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -ftracer for pr42918.c ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 11:09 ` [Bug debug/47508] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:00 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-28 15:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-30 17:35 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-31 10:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-02 10:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-03 10:13 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2011-02-03 10:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).