From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 434 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2011 14:18:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 425 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2011 14:18:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:18:17 +0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47516] testsuite failure: realloc_on_assign_2.f03 (with --disable-bootstrap) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:32:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg03300.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47516 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-30 14:17:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > 4.5.0 is the system compiler which I use to build the GCC trunk. Since the > failure only appears with --disable-bootstrap that might be relevant. > > I still see this problem at r169406. Can you try again using GCC 4.6.0 r169406 as compiler? (I.e. setting the PATH and LD_LIBRARY_PATH such that 4.6.0 is used.) For curiosity, I will try to compile without bootstrapping with 4.5.1 20101208 [gcc-4_5-branch revision 167585] However, it looks as if GCC 4.5.0 miscompiles f951; except for not bootstrapping, there should be no difference between --disable-bootstrap and not. (Contrary to --enable-checking=release.)