From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-353970-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15584 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2011 14:10:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 15568 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2011 14:10:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:09:49 +0000
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/47571] [4.7 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jb at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.1
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-47571-4-4leNjnB277@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47571-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47571-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:10:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg01874.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571

--- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-04-18 14:07:10 UTC ---
> --- Comment #53 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-18 11:47:45 UTC ---
> Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported

Yes: I had the patch in my local tree before so I could bootstrap on
alpha-dec-osf5.1b.  Over the weekend, I've removed the local patch and
bootstrap succeeded, so all is fine.

> for 4.6.1? And can then the PR be closed?

I think so: Jakub asked that the hack I put into 4.6.0 so we wouldn't
ship a broken libgfortran be replaced by a backport for 4.6.1.

    Rainer