public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tony.poppleton at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/47582] Combine chains of movl into movq Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:16:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-47582-4-wyKAnAuNri@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-47582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47582 --- Comment #2 from Tony Poppleton <tony.poppleton at gmail dot com> --- Re-testing this with GCC 5.1, the code appears to be even less efficient, for both cases; DM1: .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movss b(%rip), %xmm0 xorl %eax, %eax movss %xmm0, a(%rip) movss b+4(%rip), %xmm0 movss %xmm0, a+4(%rip) movss b+8(%rip), %xmm0 movss %xmm0, a+8(%rip) movss b+12(%rip), %xmm0 movss %xmm0, a+12(%rip) movss b+16(%rip), %xmm0 movss %xmm0, a+16(%rip) ret .cfi_endproc .LFB0: .cfi_startproc movq b(%rip), %rax movq %rax, a(%rip) movq b+8(%rip), %rax movq %rax, a+8(%rip) movl b+16(%rip), %eax movl %eax, a+16(%rip) xorl %eax, %eax ret .cfi_endproc Why is the "xorl" appearing in both cases? Should this be logged as a separate bug. Incidentally, compiling with -O1 produces the same code as -O2 on older GCCs (as in the description comment above) My total guess is it is due to a and b not having any initial values, and an optimization that takes into account value ranges is getting confused?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 16:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-02-01 21:36 [Bug rtl-optimization/47582] New: " tony.poppleton at gmail dot com 2011-02-01 22:46 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/47582] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-10 16:16 ` tony.poppleton at gmail dot com [this message] 2015-06-10 16:30 ` tony.poppleton at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-47582-4-wyKAnAuNri@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).