From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15011 invoked by alias); 28 May 2011 13:43:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 15002 invoked by uid 22791); 28 May 2011 13:43:41 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 May 2011 13:43:28 +0000 From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/47601] [OOP] Internal Error: mio_component_ref(): Component not found X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: janus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status AssignedTo Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 14:19:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg02832.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47601 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-28 13:43:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > Janus, you know type extension better than me. Does one now needs to do: > if (!p && sym->attr.extension) > { > p = search (sym->components->ts.u.derived) > if (!p && sym->components->ts.u.derived->attr.extension) > p = search (sym->components->ts.u.derived->...) > > or is this the wrong method? Yes, sounds good. Also that's exactly what 'gfc_find_component' does, so I'd propose the following patch: Index: gcc/fortran/module.c =================================================================== --- gcc/fortran/module.c (revision 174030) +++ gcc/fortran/module.c (working copy) @@ -2356,9 +2356,7 @@ mio_component_ref (gfc_component **cp, gfc_symbol if (sym->components != NULL && p->u.pointer == NULL) { /* Symbol already loaded, so search by name. */ - for (q = sym->components; q; q = q->next) - if (strcmp (q->name, name) == 0) - break; + q = gfc_find_component (sym, name, false, false); if (q == NULL) gfc_internal_error ("mio_component_ref(): Component not found"); This fixes the test case, but is not regtested.