From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31579 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2011 18:42:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 31571 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Feb 2011 18:42:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:42:39 +0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/47614] [4.6 Regression] cpu2000 benchmark 301.apsi fails with revision 169782 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 18:48:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg01223.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614 --- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2011-02-09 18:42:01 UTC --- > Or simply reject side effects, similarly how we reject them elsewhere in > postreload. Yes, I think that's good enough for now.