* [Bug debug/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-06 16:26 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2011-02-07 2:57 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca @ 2011-02-06 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-02-06 16:05:29 UTC ---
Attached dumps.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 16:26 ` [Bug debug/47622] " dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
@ 2011-02-07 2:57 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-07 11:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jiez at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-07 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.07 02:37:06
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-07 02:37:06 UTC ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 16:26 ` [Bug debug/47622] " dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
2011-02-07 2:57 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-07 11:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-08 15:06 ` [Bug testsuite/47622] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-07 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-07 11:52 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-08 15:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-08 17:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-08 15:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|debug |testsuite
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-08 15:06 ` [Bug testsuite/47622] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-08 17:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 16:12 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-08 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-08 17:37:02 UTC ---
Do we really need that scan-rtl test in there (which has been newly added to an
old testcase, why?)? If yes, can't it be limited to a few selected targets
where it is supposed to not be present?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-08 17:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 16:12 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 4:32 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 5:25 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jiez at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
--- Comment #5 from Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-09 16:04:53 UTC ---
I think my patch which causes this bug might be wrong after checking this test
case in details. I may work out a new patch following Jeff's suggestion.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-09 16:12 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-10 4:32 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 5:25 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jiez at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
--- Comment #6 from Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 04:22:49 UTC ---
Author: jiez
Date: Thu Feb 10 04:22:44 2011
New Revision: 169997
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169997
Log:
PR testsuite/47622
Revert
2011-02-05 Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
PR debug/42631
* web.c (entry_register): Don't clobber the number of the
first uninitialized reference in used[].
testsuite/
PR testsuite/47622
Revert
2011-02-05 Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
PR debug/42631
* gcc.dg/pr42631.c: Update test.
* gcc.dg/pr42631-2.c: New test.
Removed:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42631-2.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr42631.c
trunk/gcc/web.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/47622] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg"
2011-02-06 16:05 [Bug debug/47622] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr42631.c scan-rtl-dump-not web "Web oldreg" danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 4:32 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-10 5:25 ` jiez at gcc dot gnu.org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jiez at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Jie Zhang <jiez at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 04:31:54 UTC ---
I reverted my patch which caused this bug. So this bug can be closed now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread