* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 14:23 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 14:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 14:23 ` [Bug libstdc++/47662] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 14:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 14:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.09 14:27:29
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-09 14:27:29 UTC ---
I'll fix it tonight if noone beats me to it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 14:23 ` [Bug libstdc++/47662] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 14:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 14:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 15:13 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-09 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-09 14:32:50 UTC ---
I've also just noticed the manual for -fno-operator-names could do with some
improvement: those alternative tokens aren't technically keywords, they're
certainly not "synonyms as keywords" because that doesn't even make sense :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-09 14:34 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-09 15:13 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-02-10 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-02-09 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-02-09 15:10:39 UTC ---
Thanks Jon, for sure that 'or' hasn't been added on purpose.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-09 15:13 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2011-02-10 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 10:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 10:05:26 UTC ---
BTW, it would be good to have testcases covering all headers compiled with
-fno-operator-names to make sure it doesn't reappear. Perhaps with turning off
PCH first. So something like:
// { dg-do compile }
// { dg-options "-fno-operator-names" }
// Avoid using PCH
#include <cerrno>
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
#include <bits/stdtr1c++.h>
#include <bits/extc++.h>
int or, xor, and;
(and similarly with -std=gnu++0x -fno-operator-names).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 10:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-10 10:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 10:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 10:12:12 UTC ---
Good idea.
I didn't get through my whole TODO list yesterday, so didn't fix this yet
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 10:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-10 10:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-02-10 22:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-02-10 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-02-10 10:25:18 UTC ---
I also think it makes sense, we already have the right places for such tests:
testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998 and testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 10:54 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2011-02-10 22:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-10 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 22:40:58 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Feb 10 22:40:53 2011
New Revision: 170026
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170026
Log:
2011-02-10 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
PR libstdc++/47662
* include/bits/c++config: Do not use alternative token.
* testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc: New.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/c++config
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 22:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-10 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-11 0:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-02-12 19:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-10 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-10 22:43:14 UTC ---
Fixed.
I've just realised I should have put Jakub's name on the new test - sorry about
that! I haven't checked in a test for -std=gnu++0x mode yet, that will follow
shortly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-10 22:51 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-11 0:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-02-12 19:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-02-11 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-02-11 00:34:57 UTC ---
By the way, lately we have available { dg-add-options no_pch }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libstdc++/47662] [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers
2011-02-09 14:18 [Bug libstdc++/47662] New: [4.6 Regression] -fno-operator-names no longer works with STL headers jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-11 0:42 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2011-02-12 19:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-12 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47662
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-12 18:36:03 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Feb 12 18:35:59 2011
New Revision: 170084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170084
Log:
2011-02-12 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
PR libstdc++/47662
* testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x/operator_names.cc: New.
* testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc: Add comment.
Added:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++200x/operator_names.cc
Modified:
trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/operator_names.cc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread