From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3205 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2011 19:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 3191 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2011 19:24:46 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:24:42 +0000 From: "nicola at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug objc/47682] unused-but-set-variabled warning when using fast enumeration X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: objc X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nicola at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed CC Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:28:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg01355.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47682 Nicola Pero changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2011.02.10 19:24:33 CC| |nicola at gcc dot gnu.org Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-02-10 19:24:33 UTC --- Yes, this is supposed to have been fixed, even if not by me ;-) It was Iain who fixed it -- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-01/msg00219.html I see that Jos is using "gcc version 4.6.0 20101219 (experimental) (GCC)", which I'd expect wouldn't include the fix. I asked him (offline) if he could try again with a newer compiler. It works for me with GNUstep and GCC 4.6 trunk. Thanks