From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-348020-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11533 invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2011 16:55:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 11521 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Feb 2011 16:55:48 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:55:44 +0000
From: "webmaster@sky-siteweb.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/47772] warnings from -Wmissing-field-initializers contradict documentation
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: webmaster@sky-siteweb.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-47772-4-vJutTXkc1y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-47772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-47772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:03:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg02486.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D47772

Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski <webmaster@sky-siteweb.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |webmaster@sky-siteweb.com

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski <webmaster@sky-siteweb.com> 2=
011-02-21 16:55:39 UTC ---
I've the same problem with gcc 4.5.2.

Here another test case:

/*=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D*/
typedef struct bar_t {
    int a;
    int b;
} bar_t;

typedef struct foo_ok_t {
    int   bar;
    bar_t foo;
} foo_ok_t;

typedef struct foo_nok_t {
    bar_t bar;
    bar_t foo;
} foo_nok_t;

int main(void) {
    foo_ok_t foo_ok;
    foo_nok_t foo_nok;

    foo_ok =3D (foo_ok_t){
        .bar =3D 32,
    };

    foo_nok =3D (foo_nok_t){
        .bar =3D (bar_t){ .a =3D 32, .b =3D 42 },
    };

    return 0;
}
/*=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D*/


The first assignment doesn't trigger any warning, but the second one gives:
test.c:29:5: warning: missing initializer
test.c:29:5: warning: (near initialization for =E2=80=98(anonymous).foo=E2=
=80=99)